DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
DJC
Docket No. NR4261-14
3 Mar 15
L
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, |
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
2 March 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
jin accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion Furnished by NPC memo 1811 Pers-
835/070 dated 30 December 2014, a COpy of which was provided to you on
31 January 2015, and is being provided to you now.
establis ce of pro
this connection, the Board suns
ca
contained in the advisory opi C
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel wil
Ss
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. WNR4261-14
rection of an official naval
t to demonstrate the existence of
Sf La — * —
“ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Consequently, when applying for a cor
record, the burden is on the applican
probable material error or injustice.
Enclosure: NPC memo 1811 Pers-835/070 dtd 30 Dec 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6516 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior te making its decision in this case. Docket Wo.NKO6516-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an officiai faves record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5107 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 7 Nov 2014, However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01674-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. PERS-4822 15 Apr 06 MEMORANDLTM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters, PERS-31C Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject’s case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4830 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, chat the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he receive credit for his Public and Community Service (PACS) towards retirement at age 62. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 May 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09942-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2011. The Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/559 of 22 Oct 10, and NPC memo 7220 PERS-835 of 12 Jan 11, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09684-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1811 PER5-4822, 18 January 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR777 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7437 13
This is in reference to your appli record pursuant to the provisions f the Board for Correction of Naval Fecords, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correc 1 record, the burden is on the applicant to demon f£ probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02329-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2481 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.